In fact, Mutesa`s return to Uganda was outside the conference mandate.  kampala High Court`s conclusion that the British government was throwing itself into Article 6 “crazy” came shortly after the news of the agreement in Namirembe, but before the agreed recommendations were published – Cohen lobbied to admit it. In November, he reversed the british government`s position and accepted the return of Mutesa, which depended on the adoption and implementation of Namirembe`s recommendations.   “Buganda Agreement,” the Buganda Agreements from 1894 to 1955 and all other agreements concluded on Her Majesty`s behalf with Kabaka, the leaders and people of Buganda or the Kabaka government, but which do not contain buganda laws or permanent ordinances adopted under this Constitution; In an attempt to impose a solution to the deepening political crisis, Ugandan Governor Sir Andrew Cohen referred to [the Uganda Agreement (1900) and called for the Kabaka (Mutesa II) to be incorporated into the policy of the British government, which favoured the continuation of a single unified state of Uganda.[ 3] Kabaka refused.   Subsequently, the British government withdrew its recognition of Mutesa II as sovereign of Uganda, in accordance with Article 6 of the Ugandan Convention of 1900, and deported Mutesa to Britain.   News of Mutesa`s deportation severely shocked Baganda, causing a constitutional crisis.  Cohen preferred the immediate installation of a new Kabaka, which proved impossible, which required a more complete outcome of the negotiations.   In establishing Uganda`s northern border as the Kafu River, the Colvile Agreement of 1894 formalized the 1894 promise that Uganda would obtain certain areas in exchange for their support against Bunyoro.  Two of the “lost counties” (Buyaga and Bugangaizi) were returned to Bunyoro after the referendum on lost counties in Uganda in 1964.  b) Appointments must be submitted in writing, signed by the members representing them to the spokesperson on the day or before it has been fixed on that behalf.
On Tuesday, March 10, the 120th anniversary of the kingdom of Buganda, under kabaka (king) Daudi Chwa, jumped to bed with the British. The signing of the agreement not only took away the rights of the kingdom, but paved the way for the tutelage and plundering of other parts of Uganda. The agreement anchored British rule in Buganda and also gave the Baganda the opportunity to extend their influence to other parts of the country. Territories that were not under the kingdoms were taken over by Buganda`s neocolonial agents such as Semei Kakungulu. Daudi Chwa, who was a minor at the signing of the agreement, said that at the age of majority, he said that British control had watered down his authority. My current position is so early that I am no longer the direct leader of my people. I am regarded by my subjects only as one of the paid British servants. This is because I don`t really have power over my people, not even the smallest leader,” Chwa said after Baganda and the British domination of Low and Pratt in 1900-1995. Every order given, whether by my local leader or by the Lukiiko himself, is always regarded with contempt, unless confirmed by the district commissioner. Chwa`s oath showed how enslaved Buganda had been.